An Argument Against Gun Control Essay
912 Words4 Pages
A proposed federal law to outlaw all guns would be more effective at disarming
law-abiding citizens than at disarming the criminals who abuse them. If guns were
outlawed, the criminals would not stop carrying guns, but the good, law-abiding citizens
would. It would do nothing about the illegally obtained handguns in the possession of
criminals. In The NRA is Right, Josh Sugarmann states that “One tenet of the National
Rifle Association’s faith has always been that handgun controls do little to stop criminals
from obtaining handguns” (Sugarmann 185). Criminals simply aren’t discouraged, they
just ignore bans. The only two things passing a law of this nature would accomplish
would be to take away the honest…show more content…
If a student makes an error in
their writing, do we blame the pencil they use to write? Highly unlikely. Gun control
would not prevent criminals from obtaining guns. In The NRA is Right, Sugarmann
argues “ The black market that has fed off the legal sale of handguns would continue for
a long while” (Sugarmann 190). Most criminals get guns through informal off-the-record
swaps, purchases and trades with relatives, friends, drug-dealers, or other street sources.
Spending millions of dollars on a fail proof checking system would cause felons to stop
buying guns from a shop, and send them to buy their weapons from the streets.
Guns are effective forms of self-defense. Taking them away would leave civilians
defenseless and easy targets. Guns, when stored and operated correctly and safely can
create a sense of safety. When used for protection, guns provide a psychological buffer
against the fear of crime. When protected by a gun, people often feel safer because if
something should arise they have some sort of security. Criminals will avoid situations
where there is a possibility that their target may be armed. Guns can save a potential
victim from becoming one. Victims who use guns for protection are less likely to be
attacked or injured than victims who respond in any other way. Since guns empower the
weak against the strong, and because victims are generally weaker than
Informative Essay: The Debate Over Gun Control
- Length: 2111 words (6 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.
Guns are extremely powerful weapons. They can cause destruction, harm or even death. They can be used to defend and protect or to threaten and kill. Any way you look at it, guns are powerful tools, not only physically but socially. As college students it is important to stay abreast of the current events and issues circulating our country today, one of which is the controversial issue of gun control. It is extremely important to pay attention to where gun control laws are headed. The directions they take not only affect our nation and society but our future as well as we all move to communities and begin to raise families.
So why is gun control such a hot debate? Perhaps to answer this question it would be important to look at some key statistics concerning handguns in our society. In this nation, where nearly half of all US households own at least one gun, nearly 30,000 people die from a gunshot each year (Dahl). From this alone it is no wonder gun control is such an important issue, however as bad as this may seem, the number of firearm related incidents have decreased over the years. In the early 1990’s the number of people killed or wounded by firearms soared. Since 1993 however the US has seen a steady drop in deaths due to firearm (The Lancet). Fatal firearms accidents have declined as well, nearly 40 percent in the last decade, and are now at the lowest levels ever recorded (Poe). So why the sudden drop? Antigun advocates would like to attribute this to an increase in gun control laws while pro gun advocates point to a decrease in unemployment rates along with other social factors.
How to Cite this Page
| The Debate Over Gun Control Essay - In the United States of America, we as people have certain guaranteed rights, and one of those is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has been a crucial issue throughout the history of this country and still continues to be of vital importance today. Today there are several conflicts with this amendment the 1st being a law-abiding citizens right to own a weapon, Second the crime rates because of these weapons and 3rd being the distribution of weapons.... [tags: Informative Essay, Political Science]|
:: 7 Works Cited
| The Gun Control Debate Continues Essay - In today’s society it’s easy to find something in a newspaper, magazine, or on television that portrays the scrutiny of guns in the home. While reading or viewing such opinions it can possibly influence one to see issues in a particular way. It is not my goal to persuade you to lean in a specific direction but to see the issue from different angles. When viewing both arguments you are faced with reflecting on your own opinion and possibly agreeing more firmly with your own choice or changing your outlook and coming across the subject in a new way.... [tags: Informative Essay]|
:: 10 Works Cited
| Essay about Politics and Gun Control - A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. -U. S. Constitution, "Amendment II" Over 200 years ago, when the Founding Fathers drafted the Second Amendment, no one ever questioned the need for private gun ownership. The founders at that time had considered that private firearms were efficient to protecting personal liberty, both as a means of opposing foreign threats and also as a check against excessive government power.... [tags: Informative Essay, Political Science]|
:: 4 Works Cited
| Essay about Guns and Elections: The Politics of Gun Control - In the book Guns, Gun Control, and Elections: The Politics and Policy of Firearms, Wilson discusses the complex issue of gun control and the many debates and controversies regarding the issue. Many people throughout the United States feel it is the right as a citizen in the United States to own a weapon, and the government should have no say in the matter. These people believe this because of the part of the Second Amendment that states, “The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” People who are strong advocates against gun control use this part of the Second Amendment to drive their point across.... [tags: Informative Essay, Political Science]|
:: 9 Works Cited
|Informative Speech For Gun Ownership - Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of the citizen to bear arms is just one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible. -Hubert Humphrey, 1960 My background is probably atypical for a somewhat high-profile supporter of the right to keep and bear arms.... [tags: essays research papers]||650 words|
|Informative Essay: Has the Brady Act been Successful? - The Brady act was created with the intention of interrupting firearm sales to individuals who are legally prohibited from owing guns, such as minors, convicted felons and the mentally ill. The 5 day waiting period provides the chance for the firearms dealer to perform a national criminal background check before transferring any firearm to a customer. Originally 32 states were required to implement the Brady act. However, in 1997 during Printz V United States, the law was temporarily on hold due to a challenge based on the grounds of the 10th amendment which ensured states to retain power over their own territory.... [tags: Informative Essays]||380 words|
| The Gun Control Debate Essay - "I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it." -- Clint Eastwood Gun control has a history dating back to 1791, when the Second Amendment of the Constitution was ratified. However, more recently, the debate over gun control has escalated into a much more public issue to which many citizens can relate. After all, stories about incidents involving guns appear frequently today in newspapers and on television or the radio. One could say that the debate started with the passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968, which banned ownership of guns by certain groups of people and regulated the sale of guns.... [tags: Gun Control, 2015]|
:: 3 Works Cited
| The Debate on Gun Control and the Second Amendment Essay - Guns have been around for a very long time. People love being able to have the freedom to do what they want, especially when they can possess something that make them feel superior. The introduction of the Second Amendment opens up the controversial, yet well anticipated opportunity for United State citizens to be able to own guns. Americans enjoy the benefit of being able to own guns for decades over people in other countries. People can buy guns and carry them around in public. They own guns for many reasons such as to hunt, to protect themselves, and simply to satisfy their desire of owning a gun, but in recent years, the issue of people carry guns has become a problem.... [tags: Gun Control Essays]|
:: 6 Works Cited
| History of Gun Control in America Essay examples - Introduction When it comes to controversial topics in today’s society, there are so many that it can be difficult to be a straight shooter. Among all of them, however, debate over gun control has been prevalent for so long, it is something many people can easily set their sights on. It is an issue everybody should have an opinion on, as it is vastly important, potentially threatening, and all too present in modern society. Many find the mere concept of gun control invasive to their constitutional rights, while others see lack of gun control to be astoundingly dangerous and entirely chimerical.... [tags: gun control act, shooter, debate]|
:: 1 Works Cited
| Essay about The Gun Control Debate - Gun control is a highly controversial topic in the United States. There are many advocates of gun control - people who wish to have stricter laws to prevent certain groups of people from purchasing a firearm. However, there are also the people who disagree with gun control laws and believe there should be a more lenient gun control to furthermore help people defend themselves during risky situations. Many gun control laws have been passed for many years. While many have been passed, many have been voted unconstitutional meaning they affect the citizens second amendment rights.... [tags: Gun Control Essays]|
:: 12 Works Cited
Gun Control Debate Gun Control Laws Our Nation Pay Attention Our Future Controversial Issue Firearms
The real question here is, do gun control laws work? From the statistics it would appear so. But in order to fully understand the issue it is important to first take a look at the current gun control laws that are now in effect. There are a number of laws both at the federal and the state level restricting the sale, purchase and use of guns. Though they vary from state to state there are some basic federal laws which are in affect nationwide. Some of these include that no person convicted of a crime can own a gun, a person must be 21 or older to purchase a handgun and that “persons who engage in the business of buying or selling firearms must be licensed” (NRA). Perhaps one of the laws having the most profound impact recently was the passing of the 1993 Brady Handgun Control Act which is now in affect in 32 states. This act requires a waiting period for the purchase of a handgun as well as background check system to ensure against the possession of guns by criminals.
The effects of gun control laws have been extensive and far-reaching though they don’t altogether deter people from acquiring a firearm. The Brady Handgun Control Act made it increasingly more difficult and trying process to purchase and own a gun. Gun control advocates say this is not enough, that although firearm related incidents have declined since its enactment tougher laws are needed or more acts of firearm violence will continue to plague the nation. Pro-gun advocates see gun control laws as only a way for the government to control its citizens. The real debate, for both sides, comes down to who should own a gun and under what restrictions should they be able to possess it?
This is an important question to everyone involved in the issue, and extremely important to society as a whole. Guns play a role in everyone’s lives to some degree, whether it be your own personal possession of a hunting rifle or a pistol in the hands of a youth in your neighborhood. We as Americans value our rights to freedoms granted to us by our forefathers, which includes the possession of firearms as stated in the Second Amendment. As citizens we must ask ourselves; do we really want gun control laws which are created to protect us, to take away our basic rights as citizens?
As such an important issue, there is a myriad of groups involved in the debate. It is not simply one of pro-gun/anti-gun but rather is one that transcends the usual pro and con debate to become a national issue on a number of levels and approaches, three in specific, all with different interests and views. These approaches include the political approach the social approach and the criminality approach.
The political approach on gun control deals with the issue of laws and political organizations that surround the debate. The government is where the critical laws are made concerning gun control, which in turn effect the entire country, and therefore is important to look at as a key player in the debate.
There are two major sides or parties in the political realm that are lobbying either for or against gun control. These two would of course be the Democrats and the Republicans, the two dominating parties in the country today. The Republicans have long been supporters of the pro gun movement, largely due to both their conservative nature as well as an increased backing over the years by the National Rifle Association, a powerful force in the pro gun movement. During the 2000 elections the NRA gave 92 percent of its Congressional campaign contributions to the Republicans (Stell), giving the party ample ammo to promote their cause. Democrats are known to be largely for gun control but as public support has waned, in part due to an increase in gun sales after the 9/11 attacks so to has the Democrats enthusiasm to bring up the issue. No doubt both sides seek to win votes by appealing to a specific side of the debate, in this case the Republicans are winning.
Of course one of the main responsibilities of a government is to keep and protect the basic rights of its citizens as well as to make new laws that ensure their safety or well being. This is especially true in the area of gun control. One of the great debates in gun control is to whether or not the Second Amendment truly does grant the freedom of firearm ownership to common citizens. Recently, the stand on the issue held for nearly 70 years that the amendment granted these rights to only militia was challenged by Attorney General John Ashcroft. In his Supreme Court filings in 2002 Ashcroft wrote that “the Second Amendment more broadly protects the rights of individuals…to possess and bear their own firearms.” (Tulmulty) This statement shook the foundation of gun control as well as earning praise from pro gun advocates. Citizens are greatly affected by the laws enacted by the government and it is hoped that they are working in the best interest of its citizens.
The citizens, of course, are the very core of the issue, the social side of the debate. The social approach deals with society and its citizens either working to help promote or to help prevent gun control laws. As we all know laws are only enacted in this country through the vote of the people, therefore, society as a whole is a powerful force in the gun control debate. In his article “Gun Control and the Regulation of Fundamental Rights” author Lance Stell states that the “major controversy with gun control is to whether owning or the purchase of a gun is a significant ‘social cause’ of Americas homicide and suicide rate.” This is of course the very backbone of the gun control debate and an important reason as to why gun control laws are enacted.
There are many groups behind the issue even those of racial affiliation such as the black community. There is no doubt that the black community most heavily feels the effect of guns in this country, firearm deaths are nearly 5 times that of white non-hispanics (Poe). The problem is eminent and is addressed by Earl G. Graves Sr, editor of Black Enterprise, who seeks a solution to the problem by paying closer attention to the youth as well as taking a “serious stand in favor of the passage and enforcement of gun control laws.” But do stricter gun control laws ensure against gun related crime? Most people associate more guns with more violence but this is not always so. Switzerland, which has more per capita firepower than any other country in the world has lower murder and robbery rates than England where guns are essentially banned (Poe). Here in the US, John Lott author of More Guns, Less Crime explains that “states experiencing the greatest reduction in crime are also the ones with the fastest growing percentages of gun ownership.” So do less guns actually mean less crime? Perhaps to answer that it would be important to look at another side of the debate, that is, criminality associated with guns.
Besides taking the guns away from common citizens in order to supposedly ensure their safety, one of the other main purposes of the gun control laws is to ensure that guns do not reach the hands of criminals. However, where there is a will there is a way and criminals often see no barriers when acquiring a gun despite the numerous laws preventing their ownership. Such laws are known as Dangerous Possessor Gun Control, which prohibits gun possession for anyone charged or convicted of a crime carrrying more than a one-year sentence (Stell). Apparently these laws aren’t doing much good. The typical murderer usually has a prior criminal history of at least 6 years with at least 4 felony arrests before he commits murder (Poe). Phyllis Schafly, president of the Eagle Forum, a pro-family organization, states that gun control advocates often “propagate the myth that most of the perpetrators of violence are ordinary citizens rather that criminals by trade.”
So who are the gun control laws taking the guns away from? It may be said that if criminals know their victims are unarmed they are less likely to be afraid of committing a criminal act against them. In Canada and England where there is a virtual ban on guns the burglary rate involving guns (known as a “hot burglary) is nearly 50 percent compared to 13 percent in America (Poe). Of course gun control advocates may disagree with the notion that putting guns back into the hands of citizens would halt the majority of crimes. Kristen Rand, legislative director of the Violence Policy Center says that, “Unrealistic scenarios in which criminals meekly surrender at the mere sight of a handgun shouldn’t be our guide. Real life is different.” Clearly the issue over whether gun control laws hurt or help the people they are trying to protect will be met with endless debate.
So who is most responsible for the enactment of gun control laws? The answer is each side, political, social and criminal. The connection can be easily made between the three. It is the criminal aspects of gun control, which cause significant social strife and in turn political action. The net effect is that all three together are working to either prevent or promote the enactment of gun control laws, laws that have a significant impact to every person on every side of the debate.
It is clear from the number of groups involved that the debate over gun control will not soon fade. It is certain that in our lifetime we will see significant changes in the current policy dealing with the possession of firearms. It is important that we pay close attention to this debate seeing as how it will have a great impact on our lives. Do gun control laws help or hurt the people the citizens they are trying to protect? Does enacting these laws take away our fundamental rights as citizens? We must all think carefully.